Text-Processing

FREEMIUM
Durch Jacob | Aktualisiert il y a 25 jours | Text Analysis
Popularität

9.5 / 10

Latenz

318ms

Service Level

100%

Health Check

N/A

Zurück zu allen Diskussionen

Wrong s expression result.

Rapid account: Jandark
jandark
il y a 8 ans

For the following sentence s expression result should be as following:
sentence:
Medical advice ranges from the confusing to the disapproving, while a financial disincentive could even transpire in the form of a long-mooted tax on soft drinks.
result:

(ROOT
(S
(NP (NNP Medical) (NN advice))
(VP (VBZ ranges)
(PP (IN from)
(NP (DT the)
(ADJP (JJ confusing)
(PP (TO to)
(NP (DT the) (NN disapproving))))))
(, ,)
(SBAR (IN while)
(S
(NP (DT a) (JJ financial) (NN disincentive))
(VP (MD could)
(ADVP (RB even))
(VP (VB transpire)
(PP (IN in)
(NP
(NP (DT the) (NN form))
(PP (IN of)
(NP
(NP (DT a) (JJ long-mooted) (NN tax))
(PP (IN on)
(NP (JJ soft) (NNS drinks))))))))))))

Your api response as there is only one node:

{
“text”: “(S\n (GPE Medical/JJ)\n advice/NN\n ranges/NNS\n from/IN\n the/DT\n confusing/NN\n to/TO\n the/DT\n disapproving/NN\n ,/,\n while/IN\n a/DT\n financial/JJ\n disincentive/JJ\n could/MD\n even/RB\n transpire/VB\n in/IN\n the/DT\n form/NN\n of/IN\n a/DT\n long/JJ\n -/:\n mooted/VBN\n tax/NN\n on/IN\n soft/JJ\n drinks/NNS\n ./.)”
}

Rapid account: Jandark
jandark Commented il y a 8 ans

Ok, thanks.

Rapid account: Japerk
japerk Commented il y a 8 ans

Hi, the tagging API does not do deep parsing. It only does phrase level chunking, and by default, focuses on NE chunks. Unfortunately, while the demo supports choosing the tagger/chunker, and treebank or conll2000 will produce the results you want, I do not have that enabled right now for the tag API.

Nehmen Sie an der Diskussion teil - fügen Sie unten einen Kommentar hinzu:

Anmelden / Registrieren, um neue Kommentare zu veröffentlichen