NSFW Image Classification

免费增值
通过 inferdo | 已更新 15 days ago | Visual Recognition
人气

9.6 / 10

延迟

1,293ms

服务等级

100%

Health Check

N/A

返回所有讨论

Why so many false positives?

Rapid account: Dzek 69
dzek69
2 years ago

I tested this API and it seems to consider every image containing a woman a NFSW.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/GroundedThatEuropeanfiresalamander-mobile.jpg - 89% confidence, where I would expect around 60%, because you can see her shoulders so this is a tricky image (still no nudity)
https://i.vgy.me/Kd8Aik.png - 99%, is this because of open mouth?
https://i.vgy.me/5mxSQe.png - 94%, even more than first image - why?

It looks like this model was trained on porn images only - it doesn’t know anything about NOT porn?

https://i.vgy.me/a2ntyh.png - single color image - 13%
https://i.vgy.me/K4s9Ds.jpg - at least the nature got really low score of 1%

Rapid account: Litmind
litmind Commented 8 months ago

Same here, tested with thousands of manually classified photos and this model is not trained to properly detect NSFW images, and cannot be trusted to do so.

加入讨论 - 在下面添加评论:

登录/注册以发布新的评论